Where's the nearest cash machine? <a href=" http://drakeed.com/glycomet-gp2-tablets.pdf#charms ">order metformin</a> Sentencing has never been given over exclusively to the judge's discretion; instead, it has been a shared function. From the founding of the republic, the executive branch has had the ability to decide whether to bring a more or a less serious charge; the legislative branch has set the general parameters of sentencing ranges; and the judicial branch &ndash; the judge &ndash; has imposed the specific sentence. It is one thing, and wise, to give judges substantial discretion. It's another to give them all of it, exempt from checks and balances. Because judges vary widely in temperament, ideology and experience, letting individual ones decide without constraint what the sentence will be is sure to lead to irrational disparity. Without congressionally imposed floors, we'll go back to the luck-of-the-draw. Nearly identical defendants with similar records will get widely varying sentences based solely on whose courtroom they're assigned to.