Another year <a href=" http://www.gasworldltd.co.uk/acyclovir-no-prescription-uk.pdf#favorite ">where to buy acyclovir uk </a> True, but that&#39;s largely a private cost, borne by the individual smoker (through lower lifetime consumption brought about by early death). The "zombie" agument that Auld (and others) attack is that smoking imposes a social cost on people other than the smoker (i.e., through higher publicly funded health care costs). Non-smokers can legitimately complain about costs that smokers impose on non-smokers, but not about costs that smokers impose on themselves.