I'm interested in this position <a href=" http://herrljungacider.se/wateraid/ ">celexa generic vs brand</a> Well, let me start and I know Dave will want to add. First of all, Aereo is a very, very, very small number of subscribers at this point, barely a blip on the screen, so we'll start with that. So its impact right now is obviously extraordinarily inconsequential. But what I would say is that as a content creator, we philosophically believe that content creators should be compensated for the use of their content. That's what retransmission revenues and fees are all about, us being fairly compensated for the content that we provide. And we're not directly involved, but clearly, on the West Coast, the trial courts of the area have taken quite a different picture of this and a different attitude and result than the New York courts have taken thus far. We believe that the courts are ultimately going to conclude that Aereo must compensate broadcasters before it can retransmit over-the-air broadcast programming to its subscribers. I mean, that's just a fundamental tenet of copyright laws and content and everything else. But, Dave, I don't know if you want to...