Will I be paid weekly or monthly? http://buycouponordernow.top/maps/sitemap4.html bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0.03 It makes the point that to prove the aiding the enemy charge the government has to show that Manning had ACTUAL knowledge that by transmitting documents to WikiLeaks he was passing them to al-Qaida and other enemy groups. Yet in his training as an intelligence analyst the name WikiLeaks was never mentioned, and one of those involved in the training had never even heard of WikiLeaks. The prosecution cites the report of a counter-intelligence investigation into WikiLeaks as evidence that Manning knew the organisation was dangerous. Manning transmitted the report to the anti-secrecy website and WikiLeaks cheekily published it - ie published the government's investigation into its own activities. Yet significantly the report was titled with a question: "Wikileaks.org - An Online reference to Foreign Intelligence Services, Insurgents, or Terrorist Groups?" That question mark could be crucial as it showed that even the US gov didn't have a firm idea of what WikiLeaks was, let alone Manning himself