I was born in Australia but grew up in England <a href=" http://www.tcheaz.com/cost-of-retin-a-micro-pump.pptx#photocopy ">obagi tretinoin cream usp 0.05</a> As a mining engineer I am familiar with the basis of the argument made in this article. That LNG-export is solely in the interests of the industry and their shareholders is fairly well established. However, blocking LNG-exports would be an unusual step for the US because it doesn&#8217;t have an energy policy. However, who&#8217;s to say whether the government sees, or cares about the big picture of jobs, and the competitive dynamic of doing just this. As things stand, chemical producers using US natural gas for feedstock indeed have an immense cost advantage, which means jobs. Similarly, foundries, power plants, and other users of large scale amounts of energy have an advantage, which will dissipate with LNG-export. I guess it&#8217;s a matter of benefit for the few or benefit for the many, and this treads dangerously close to political thoughts contrary to the American way. We&#8217;ll see, won&#8217;t we? If I were a betting man, I&#8217;d put my money on the outcome being influenced by the vast number of dollars being spent to influence the politicians. What else is new?